Hive Min Hee-jin has filed an objection with the prosecution today (15th) for non-transmission of breach of duty.
Jul 15, 2025
|
On the 15th, Hive said "We plan to file an objection with the prosecution immediately today against the failure to send the case of breach of duty filed last year against former CEO Min Hee-jin."
Hive said "After the police investigation, a new situation occurred, including the announcement of termination of the contract by the members of the Newzins, and a number of new evidence was submitted in related trials, and based on this, the court judged the former representative Min's actions very seriously."The reason for receiving the objection was that the "Temporary Appeals Tribunal (Seoul High Court) deliberately destroyed the integrated structure that was the premise of the exclusive contract" against former representative Min.
In July last year, the investigation authorities decided not to send charges against former CEO Min Hee-jin and others for obstruction of business and violation of the orthodox network law (defamation).
In this regard, Hive said "The investigation authorities judged that Hive's allegations are difficult to see as false facts and that the purpose of slander is not recognized because they are about the public interest, and that the KakaoTalk conversation is recognized as acquired by legitimate authority during the audit process." he said.
In addition, Hive also announced that former CEO Min's indiscriminate complaints and accusations against Hive and its executives and employees are all being concluded to be non-transmittal.
▶ Hereinafter, Hive's official entrance
I'm informing you from Hive.
The company will immediately file an objection with the prosecution today against Hive's former CEO Min Hee-jin, who was not sent to the office last year.
After the police investigation, new situations such as the announcement of termination of the contract by the members of the Newzins occurred, and a number of new evidence was submitted in related trials, and based on this, the court judged former representative Min's actions very seriously. As the Court of Appeals for Disposition (Seoul High Court) has decided against former representative Min that he is intentionally destroying the integrated structure that was the premise of the exclusive contract, we would like to argue about the decision to reject the appeal process.
In addition, the investigation authorities decided not to send charges against former CEO Min Hee-jin and others for obstruction of business and violation of the orthodox network law (defamation) against five Hive executives in July last year. The investigation authorities judged that Hive's allegations were not recognized for the purpose of slander because they were about the public interest, and that the KakaoTalk conversation was acquired by legitimate authority during the audit process.
In addition, I would like to inform you that we are receiving a non-transmission conclusion for all cases that former CEO Min has indiscriminately filed and filed complaints against Hive and its employees.
▲ Former CEO Min Hee-jin accused Bilibrap management and creative directors of defamation and innocence ▲ Team Bernese accused Bilibrap management and others of violating the law (defamation), ▲ All of the cases that Shin Woo-seok, CEO of Dolphin Mobilization Corp., sued the current management of Airdo for violating the law (defamation) were rejected or dismissed without charges.
Thank you.
anjee85@sportschosun.com
