Kim Soo-hyun Denies Dating Kim Saeron as a Minor

Oct 05, 2025

Kim Soo-hyun Denies Dating Kim Saeron as a Minor
Kim Soo-hyun.Sports Chosun DB



Actor Kim Soo-hyun again denied the late Kim Sae-ron's romantic relationship when he was a minor.

Lawyer Ko Sang-rok, Kim Soo-hyun's legal representative, repeatedly refuted allegations that Kim Soo-hyun dated the deceased, who was a minor, through his YouTube channel 'Advanced Gobyeon' on the 4th.

In the released video, lawyer Koh "The photograph in question was specified to have been taken between February 18 and 23, 2020. And you can prove this by submitting this iPad itself to the investigative agencyIt seems that the deceased did not initially intend to publish the above false statement draft, which seemed to have been prepared with the help of someone at the time. If this false statement had been published as it was at the time, the claim that the photo was taken in 2016 would immediately have been revealed to be false, and there would have been no reason for the deceased not to know it to push ahead with the false statement announcement."




Then "The 12-year age difference between Kim Soo-hyun and the deceased is an objective and unchanging fact. Nevertheless, the above draft false statement stated 'My age was 16 years old, and my opponent's age was 30 years old', indicating a contradiction in itself. If the deceased is 16, the actor should be 28, and if the actor is 30, the deceased should be 18"This would have been a propaganda designed and prepared to create an image of psychological domination and sexual exploitation of children (under the age of 16) that men in their thirties regard as incapable of sexual self-determination under current laws and social norms."

In the meantime, even though it was clearly revealed that the actor had never dated the deceased as a minor, malicious comments are still being posted""I didn't date him for a single day when he was a minor.""When it is revealed that ' is revealed, some continue to commit a ridiculous second round of abuse, such as 'There is a timing for explaining this time, and Kim Soo-hyun is already done'" he appealed.

Meanwhile, Kim Soo-hyun held a press conference in March this year and said he had dated the late Kim Sa-ron for about a year after he became an adult. However, he said he did not date the deceased when he was a minor. In addition, Kim Sae-ron's bereaved family revealed a reconstructed version of the KakaoTalk conversation, raising suspicions of manipulation and releasing an appraisal.




Hereinafter, full text of Kim Soo-hyun's official position.

1. Other adjacent photos remained on the actor's iPad along with the photo in question (the late actor and actor face-to-face), and the series of photos confirmed the date of the front and back shooting several days apart. As a result, the photo in question was specified to have been taken between February 18 and 23, 2020. And we were able to prove this by submitting this iPad itself to the investigative agency as it is.

2. It appears that the deceased had no intention of presenting the above false statement to the outside world, which appeared to have been prepared with the help of someone at the time (pictured). If this false statement had been published as it was at the time, the claim that the photo was taken in 2016 would immediately have been revealed to be false, and there would have been no reason for the deceased to push ahead with the false statement. Nevertheless, this false statement, which could not be published at the time, was prepared for some reason, and it set the stage for this one year later.




3. For some reason (A), this false statement of position was left under the involvement of the deceased, and it was used a year later for serious cybercrime against innocent actors by people left behind for another reason (B) and by Se-yeon. The ripple effect was enormous, and those consequences could of course be foreseen. The perpetrators now, so obviously, are claiming that they just believed the deceased's direct Kakao Talk message. In this regard, the existing lawyers have already confirmed that they have asked the police for an accurate investigation.

4. 2024. 3. 25. The draft false statement made under the involvement of the deceased for some reason contains a number of obvious errors. This is the point that actor Kim Soo-hyun tried to convey at a press conference on March 31. However, the actors and agencies chose to simply reveal the truth at the time and quietly prove it through their existing lawyers, due to the memory of the deceased and concerns about damage to fellow celebrities. This is a sacrifice made by the victim, the actor, and the judgment should be respected.

5. Representatively, the 12-year age difference between the deceased and the actor is an objective constant fact. Nevertheless, the above draft false statement states that "I was 16 years old, my opponent was 30 years old" and pointed out a contradiction in itself. If the deceased is 16, the actor should be 28, and if the actor is 30, the deceased should be 18. Nevertheless, this statement was not enough to be a complete false fact, and in addition to that, the immutable fact was adapted to paint the false fact as maliciously as possible. This would have been a prepared propaganda designed to create an image of a man in his thirties psychologically dominating and sexually exploiting children (under the age of 16) considered incapable of sexual self-determination under current laws and social norms.

6. And, for some reason mentioned earlier, this project at the time had already been 'started' on March 25, 2024, but it could not have been 'executed' in the first place because it had no choice but to immediately prove false if it was at that time, but when the deceased died a year later, it was completely 'executed' toward the actor by means of exactly the same malicious frame maneuver (child psychological domination sexual exploitation).

7. And, immediately after that, despite the agency and actors constantly raising immediate and specific objections, Se-yeon later framed the actor with fabricated evidence and distorted interpretation, driving the victim to death. And, that false claim continues seven months later (recently: September 30, 2025 at the time of Seiyeon's live broadcast).

8. From the beginning of the incident, the actor had to face tremendous criticism from the public who were deceived by false frames, and no matter how objective the agency and actors refuted it, the fabrication of the Gaseyeon and the act of harm became even stronger. He tried to personally kill and bury the victim and bury her socially by first reinforcing and continuing false claims, such as dating for six years from the third grade of middle school and later sex in the second grade of middle school.

9. However, for the past seven months, our society has not been able to stop it. In fact, even if it's not the actor's diary letter I released a few days ago, it's too clear that a single letter from the actor to the deceased, who was in his third year of high school while serving in the military, cannot be evidence of their relationship at the time. Not only that, but on the contrary, the letter was rather an objective proof that the perpetrators' claims of 'child psychological domination and sexual exploitation over the years from childhood' were groundless. Can a person who has had sex with a child in the second year of middle school and dominated, exploited, and targeted psychology for the next four years write down the small impressions he felt while looking at nature and the sky and his determination to faithfully participate in military life like an essay? Nevertheless, the perpetrator's incitement paralyzed the public's normal thinking, and the majority of the public neglected or ignored secondary offenses against victims of cybercrime.

10. In the early days of the incident, the perpetrator ignored the court's provisional measures to stop stalking through repeated broadcasts, and the misconduct continues to this day. In the meantime, the forced investigation to secure evidence requested by the victim was not conducted on the grounds of the suspect's right to defend himself. 'I'll release thousands of photos right after the presidential election'His rant dampened the media, and four months after Election Day (June 3), he failed to present a single photo, but there was no voice to point it out. Meanwhile, the media and public interest has faded.

11. Victims and families who were killed in social personality over fabricated facts are still worried that other fellow celebrities will be harmed in the process of releasing evidence to reveal the truth. Victim "Truth finding is essential, but I will not harm othersHe established the principle of ' and declared that he would reveal the truth only through investigation, suppressing his desire to resolve the injustice as soon as possible. However, the victim's sacrifice has been reduced to a laughing stock by some YouTubers who have confirmed the perpetrator's claims as true, mocked the actor and were only preoccupied with views.

12. It's been more than half a year, and I've only recently joined the lawyers to find out the truth and the progress of the case. And after deliberation with the existing lawyers, they persuaded the inevitability and decided to disclose the evidence to the minimum extent. Thank you for understanding and reporting exactly my purpose, and fortunately, I feel that public opinion is gradually returning to normal.

13. However, even now, there are some who help the perpetrators, voicing that they lack proof. How far do we have to prove that the victim doesn't exist? If possible, I hope there will be no more disclosure of additional evidence. However, if the inevitable case comes, we will deal with it as carefully as possible so that it does not harm others, depending on the position that actors and agencies have consistently maintained from the beginning.

14. Despite the fact that the actor had never been involved with the deceased as a minor, malicious comments are still coming up. 'I didn't date him for a single day when he was a minorWhen it turns out that ' is the case, some continue to commit a ridiculous second attack, saying, 'There is a timing in explaining this time, Kim Soo-hyun is already done'. Should that be the case? Is Korea really okay with that?

15. Cybercrime can hit anyone.

Advancing AI technology is making this crime more sophisticated and widespread, and we are all quickly entering its worst environment right now.

If you can't stop this now, the next victim could be your friend, family, or yourself. I still remember the sadness and inkiness left by actor Lee Sun-kyun's death. It's time to break the hook. And I hope this incident will be the trigger.

16. Don't put cold water on the victim's efforts to reveal the truth. People who insist on fatigue appeals saying, 'I don't want to know the truth anymore' have created a social monster like today's Gase-yeon.

Please don't be an accomplice with them.

Kim Soo-hyun's legal representative

Ko Sang-rok, a lawyer who is a law firm

- 2025. 10. 4.





antahn22@sportschosun.com