Jin Hae-sung is angry at the article that lost the school gang...It's upsetting to see me as if I admitted to school
Nov 18, 2025
|
Jin Hae-sung posted on social media on the 18th, "I'm upset because only the fact that I lost the civil suit was highlighted as if I had admitted my school record."I won the application for provisional injunction. "
Earlier, the 20th Civil Division of the Seoul Central District Court (Judge Lee Se-ra) ruled against the plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by Jinhae-sung and his agency KDH Entertainment against the reveler A for damages worth 10 million won.
The court dismissed all Jinhae-sung's claims and made Jinhae-sung bear the costs of the lawsuit.
Jin Hae-sung stressed that `I first applied for a provisional injunction, and the court decided that A should delete the article and not repost it.'
According to this, A was ordered to delete the post within 3 days of delivery of the decision, and to pay 3 million won per day if he did not comply with it and 1 million won per repost.
He said the reason for not appealing was that the purpose was not to receive damages. I wanted the other party to stop doing it and did not appeal because it was a lawsuit to prevent further controversy", he explained.
"But I'm upset that the articles were reported as if they admitted the school record," he said again.
Jinhaeseong "I don't want to disappoint those who believed me. I announce my position in the hope that it will not harm those I work with," he said, adding that "I hope that at the end of this article, there will be no more controversy."
Meanwhile, Mr. A raised controversy by posting that Jin Hae-sung suffered school violence when he was in middle school shortly after winning the KBS2 'Trot National Sports Festival' in 2021.
▶Next is Jinhae-seong's entrance statement
Hello, I'm Jinhaeseong.
I would like to tell you about my recent issue.
First of all, I won the civil suit first by applying for an injunction.
The winning contents are as follows.
Posting on Jinhaeseong Hakpok shall not be deleted or posted. If the litigant (debtor) fails to implement the deletion within three days from the date of service of this decision, pay the money calculated at a rate of KRW 3,000,000 per day from the end of three days to "Jinhaeseong" and pay the money calculated at a rate of KRW 1,000,000 per case if he posts the decision three days after he/she is served.
That's what they decided.
The following is what I received from the lawyer about the ruling.
As described above, four years have passed since the Plaintiffs' request for provisional injunction and the decision on provisional injunction, and the Defendant has deleted all Internet posts and stopped obstructing business thereafter
- The Plaintiffs' legal action in this case was aimed at suspending the Defendant's actions as above, and was not necessarily to receive damages
Accordingly, the Plaintiffs do not file an appeal even after losing the main lawsuit, so they expect to be resolved peacefully without any further disputes between the parties
I respect the court's ruling, but what I'm sorry about is my honest feeling.
And the reason I didn't appeal was that I didn't file a lawsuit for damages, but the purpose of the other party's suspension of conduct, as I said above, and I didn't appeal because I wanted there to be no more controversy like this. But I'm upset that the article came out as if I acknowledged my school record.
Above all, I didn't want to disappoint those who believed in me, and I thought I should express my position so as not to bother those who are with me.
I hope there will be no more controversy through this article.
Sorry to worry you.
narusi@sportschosun.com
