Newzins vs. Doror is in a situation to agree on the first trial of an exclusive contract. vs. Min Hee-jin and Mo-soon

Apr 03, 2025

Newzins vs. Doror is in a situation to agree on the first trial of an exclusive contract. vs. Min Hee-jin and Mo-soon



Group Newzins declared an all-out war against Adore.

The hearing of the 41st Civil Affairs Department of the Seoul Central District Court (Chief Judge Chung Hwa-il) on the morning of the 3rd held the first interrogation date of the exclusive contract (prosecution) filed by Adore against the five members of the New Jeans.

All of Newzins attended and voiced their opinions on the date related to the injunction, including the preservation of the agency's status and the signing of advertising contracts, which were previously raised by Adore, but did not attend this date.




Adore says that Newzins' exclusive contract signed in April 2022 is valid. He also said he hopes to reach an agreement or adjustment.

However, Newzins says the contract was terminated as of November last year. He also blocked the possibility of reconciliation, saying, `It is not possible to think of such a thing (agreement or mediation)."

Newzins vs. Doror is in a situation to agree on the first trial of an exclusive contract. vs. Min Hee-jin and Mo-soon
In particular, the point where the two sides fiercely faced off on this day is the difference in position on former representative Min.




"It is true that former representative Min has contributed to the existence of the current New Gins, but it makes no sense that the New Gins is impossible without the former representative Min. It doesn't make sense that Audor is the No. 1 Hive affiliate in the industry and can't support Newzins through other producers. Newzins recently finished its Hong Kong performance well without the help of former CEO Min. Just by looking at this, there is a contradiction in Newzins' claim that only former representative Min is possible.

In response, Newzins said "We cannot trust Adore, whose management has all been replaced. It is important that not only former representative Min's absence, but also the communication of the alternative was not made. "The basic trust relationship is broken, so we cannot be together."

"Former representative Min was not ousted, but he went out on his own," Odor said. Despite the fact that the replacement of the CEO of management rights was deemed legitimate in accordance with the court's decision on the provisional injunction, former CEO Min offered to serve a second term as a director and produce, but former CEO Min went out saying, `It is impossible unless the CEO is returned.' Since then, he has not been able to contact former CEO Min, and Newzins unilaterally declared the termination of the contract. The company didn't have time to look for a third alternative, and it unilaterally closed the door to dialogue and communication (on the part of Newzins)."




Newzins vs. Doror is in a situation to agree on the first trial of an exclusive contract. vs. Min Hee-jin and Mo-soon
In November last year, Newzins announced the termination of its exclusive contract to Adore. In response, Adore filed a provisional injunction and a main lawsuit against the members.

On the 21st of last month, the court cited the request for provisional injunction, including the preservation of agencies and the prohibition of signing advertising contracts. In response, Newzins declared the suspension of his activities.

The next date is set at 11:10 a.m. on June 5. The court said "There was a case in which the settlement contract relationship was terminated because the settlement was not received once and could not be opened, but this is an unusual case. I'll think about how to look at the relationship"I struggled.



silk781220@sportschosun.com