Part of Newzins Parents Opposed To Terminating Exclusive Contracts? Actually, no..Unpleted by Adore that abused domestic affairs (Full Story)

Apr 04, 2025

Part of Newzins Parents Opposed To Terminating Exclusive Contracts? Actually, no..Unpleted by Adore that abused domestic affairs  (Full Story)
After the legal appearance, Newzins (NJZ)

girl group Newzins (NJZ) answers reporters' questions as they leave the court building after the interrogation date of the injunction application for the preservation of the status of an agency and the conclusion of an advertising contract held at the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul on the 7th.




Parents of the group New Jin's refuted the rumor of division related to the termination of exclusive contracts.

On the 4th, the parents of Newzins posted a lengthy statement on their official account.

Parents are divided among the parents of the membersWhat ' is not true at all. To correct the misunderstanding, we state our position."




"All five members have a firm position that they cannot go back to Hibe, and this is a decision made after sufficient consultation with their families." "As they initially promised not to start legal action unless all five agreed, the members deeply trust each other and are united. Even now, the members remain in the same position, and our parents fully respect and support their children's will. Despite the current difficult situation, the members are continuing their friendship with five people meeting frequently, and parents are also continuing strong relationships by communicating more periodically through these difficulties," he stressed.

Part of Newzins Parents Opposed To Terminating Exclusive Contracts? Actually, no..Unpleted by Adore that abused domestic affairs  (Full Story)
He then expressed his embarrassment at the report 'Split theory' and thought it was not worth responding to because he felt someone's intention to promote division. However, since the real names of certain members have reached the level of being discussed, this position is made clear."The criticism related to member Harin is completely different from the fact. Both Harin and her parents are in solid agreement, and all other speculations about family history are also untrue."

Parents are experiencing extreme stress for both the member and the family due to unilateral speculation without any basis"It is the work of other members to adjust parental rights in respect of the will of their underage children, and this family also has a firm will of their children and mothers, so we ask you to refrain from speculating about the family history."




Then "The issue of parental rights is a family affair of an individual. I hope that there will be no malicious use of the matter in connection with the legal dispute with Theodore in the future. "The company on which trust should be based is playing the media by exploiting the family history of the member, but as parents, we cannot send our children there again. Adore and Hive, whose management has changed, have never shown us trust, which remains unchanged to this day," he added.

On the same day, a media outlet reported that some parents were found opposed to the dispute among members of Newzins, who are suing for the termination of their exclusive contracts with their agency, Adore.

According to the report, the court confirmed to Newzins' representative that the lawsuit was approved after the decision to exercise the family court's parental rights against Defendant 4 was made at the 41st division of the Seoul Central District Court's civil agreement on the 3rd. Currently, two of the members of the New Jeans are Hye-in and Hae-rin, and it was interpreted that legal proceedings for the exercise of parental rights were carried out due to differences between parents of one of them.




The court also pointed out that there is a flaw in the current legal representation right during the provisional injunction for preserving the status of the agency held at the 50th part of the civil agreement at the Seoul Central District Court on the 7th of last month.

At the time, Sejong, a law firm representing Newzins, said "There was an interrogation at the Family Court yesterday, and it is expected to be concluded at least next week." Judging from the statement that the decision was made on the exercise of parental authority in the court on the 3rd, and that the lawsuit so far was approved, it is interpreted that the legal proceedings were carried out according to the position of the parental authority who opposed the lawsuit and agreed.

The following is the full text of the entry of the parents of Newzins

Hello, I'm the parents of the members.

There has been a split between the parents of members, as reported by some media outlets' is not true at all. To correct the misunderstanding, we will state our position.

All five members have a firm stance that they cannot return to Hive, a decision made after sufficient consultation with their respective families. The members are deeply trusting and united in each other, as they promised in the first place that they would not even begin legal action unless all five agreed.

Even now, the members remain in the same position, and our parents fully respect and support their children's will. Despite the current difficult situation, the members continue their friendship with five people meeting frequently, and our parents continue to communicate more regularly and have a strong relationship with these difficulties, so it is embarrassing and regrettable to see unfounded rumors such as family division and member departure in the article.

I felt someone's intention to promote division, so I thought it wasn't worth responding to. However, I am expressing this position because the real names of certain members have reached the level of being discussed.

Member Harin-related scabies are completely different from the truth. Both Harin and her parents are in solid agreement, and all other speculations about family history are not true. Both the member and the family are experiencing extreme mental stress due to groundless unilateral speculation

It is another member's job to adjust parental rights in respect of the will of underage children, and this family also has a firm will of children and mothers, so we ask you to refrain from speculating about the family history.

Let me be clear that all families respect and support their children at the moment.

Article 10 of the Domestic Litigation Act states that a case being handled or handled by a family court shall not be published or broadcast in newspapers, magazines, or other publications to the extent that it is possible to guess who the person is, considering the age, occupation, and appearance of the family court.' is stipulated, and Article 72 also stipulates criminal penalties for violations of the prohibition of reporting. Please keep this in mind and refrain from indiscriminate speculation and spread of personal information.

The issue of parental rights is a family affair of an individual. I hope you will not use the matter maliciously in connection with the 'legal dispute with Dorr' in the future.

A company on which trust should be based is playing the media by exploiting a member's family history, and we as parents cannot send our children back there.

Adore and Hive, whose management has changed, have never shown us trust, and this has remained unchanged to this day.



yaqqol@sportschosun.com