Director Nam Hyun-hee was cleared of being an accomplice of Jeon Cheong-jo in two years. Son So-ho won all of the damages in the case of the pre-consultation of defense

Sep 13, 2025

Director Nam Hyun-hee was cleared of being an accomplice of Jeon Cheong-jo in two years. Son So-ho won all of the damages in the case of the pre-consultation of defense



Fencing coach Nam Hyun-hee, who was involved in the rare Jeon Cheong-jo scam, was cleared of an accomplice two years after the shocking incident.

Lawyer Sohn Soo-ho and Ji-hyuk of 'Nam's legal representative' reported on social media on the 13th that they won the entire damage suit in the case of Nam Hyun-hee fencing director Jeon Cheong-jo.

In a lawsuit for 1.1 billion won in damages filed by plaintiff A, who received a large amount of fraud from Jeon Cheong-jo, claiming that director Nam was an accomplice, the Suwon District Court's Seongnam Branch ruled on the 12th that the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. After getting close to Jeon Cheong-jo, A, a parent of Nam Hyun-hee Fencing Academy, deposited 5 million won every month if he invested 100 million won in unlisted stocks and repaid the principal a year later. If you invest in stocks of unlisted companies and sell them after being listed, you can earn at least 10 times and up to 20 times moreHe was deceived by the words and transferred KRW 1.1 billion to Jeon Cheong-jo six times between April and July 2023.




At the end of October 2023, after the shocking reality of Jeon Cheong-jo was revealed to the world, plaintiff A filed a claim for damages, claiming that director Nam Hyun-hee, who was in a relationship with Jeon Cheong-jo, was an accomplice who assisted in fraudulent activities. However, the court said in the ruling that day that the defendant (Nam Hyun-hee) did not know the substance of Jeon Cheong-jo as well as the plaintiff", he refused to admit the accomplice's claim. Looking at all the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, it was Jeon Cheong-jo and the head of the bodyguard who made an investment proposal to the Plaintiff and received the investment, and what role did the Defendant play while the Plaintiff also made a statement of the complainant?In response to the question of 'The defendant did not directly mention (the investment)There is no evidence that the defendant intentionally engaged in fraudulent assistance, as stated '. The plaintiff asked 'Did Nam Hyun-hee know when he invested in Jeon Cheong-jo?When asked by the police ', Jeon Cheong-jo said at the time of the first investment that it should be kept a secret from Nam Hyun-hee. So I didn't talk about it,' he stated. Nam Hyun-hee was unaware that Jeon Cheong-jo received investment money from Nam Hyun-hee's neighbors"It was judged.

The court said "The defendant (Nam Hyun-hee) did not know the substance of the previous request, just like the plaintiff."In light of the conversation between the defendant and the people around the defendant and the various actions the defendant would not have done had he not trusted Jeon Cheong-jo, just as the plaintiff fell into an error by trusting the appearance of Jeon Cheong-jo, the defendant also seems to have been deceived by Jeon Cheong-jo's lies and thought that Jeon Cheong-jo was the real third generation of chaebol." Regarding the Plaintiff's claim of receiving criminal proceeds, there is no evidence that the Defendant received the gift used with the former Cheongjo for living expenses or received from the former Cheongjo even though he knew that the Defendant was criminal proceeds, so this part's claim was also dismissed. The ruling resolved allegations of Nam's accomplices, which have been raised by some. In the end, A, who lost a huge amount of KRW 1.1 billion, as well as director Nam Hyun-hee, who lost his way while preparing steadily for his dream of becoming an administrator, remain the biggest victims of the Jeon Cheong-jo fraud case.

Lawyer Sohn Soo-ho and Ji-hyuk revealed the main contents on social media after the ruling, saying, `In the 1.1 billion damages lawsuit filed by the plaintiff who was fraudulent by Jeon Cheong-jo against director Nam Hyun-hee, director Nam won all of them. We have done our best to prove Nam's unfairness for the past year and 10 monthsThe case of Jeon Cheong-jo has already been widely reported and many people are interested, so the results of the trial should be informed to the public. I desperately hope that there will be no more misunderstandings and speculations,' he said.








This article was translated by Naver AI translator.