Sulli’s Brother Draws Backlash for Exposing Celebrity Private Lives

Apr 03, 2025

Choi, the late Sulli's brother, continues to reveal without a break.

Choi posted on his account on the 2nd, "'Save IU Sulli, save Kim Sae-ron, Han Ji-eun, Su-jin, Lee Jin-ho, Kwak Tae-young', "Gold Medalist", and "Real".

Afterwards "IU-Kim Soo-hyun's friendship. After the initial rejection of the main actress's proposal, Sulli threw a scenario at Sulli, and the revelation that Sulli was introduced to the psychiatric department by IU and the late Kim Sae-ron also attended the department continued.

Choi previously claimed that Sulli was in a relationship with P.O. before meeting Choi Ja.

Public opinion was also overturned when the real names and personal lives of celebrities who had nothing to do with the incident were discussed, and Sulli's past personal history, which had the right not to be known, was released to the world through her brother's mouth.

Netizens criticized, 'What is the reason for this now?', 'Even if the Sulli case is like that, other celebrities only seem to be using Sulli', 'Let Sulli rest comfortably', 'Rather, only Sulli is being consumed more sexually because of Choi'.

In response, Choi deleted the disclosure mentioning the real names of celebrities. On the 3rd, "I saw the statement posted by the gold medalist. He was a standing actor, not a stand-in actor. He/she recognized a few days before posting his/her position that he/she had suggested allegations of coercion, but there was no coercion according to several testimony. I think it would have been conducted according to the conti."

Actor Kim Soo-hyun held a press conference at Stanford Hotel in Sangam-dong, Seoul on the 31st and expressed her position on the privacy controversy. Kim Soo-hyun's statement. Reporter Huh Sang-wook's wook@sportschosun.com

Choi initially claimed that Kim Soo-hyun and Lee Ro-bae (Lee Sa-rang at the time) forced Sulli to film the exposed scene as if there was no naked exposure and bad scene that were not in the script, and tricked her into filming the exposed scene even though there was an actor. Even after Kim Soo-hyun's press conference on the late Kim Sae-ron on March 31, he said he was frustrated that he could not hear the answer to his claim, but he suddenly changed his words in three days.

At the same time, if there was no problem at the time of filming, we ask for transparent disclosure regarding director Lee Jung-seop's departure. According to what I heard, 80% of the recordings had already been recorded when director Lee Jung-seok was in the 'Real' director position. It doesn't make sense in my common sense to get off after filming that amount."

silk781220@sportschosun.com