6Sense 2 PD's clear innocence vsA's forced harassment, secondary damage
Nov 03, 2025
|
Mr. A, who claims to have been victimized by forced harassment, revealed through his legal representative Lee Eun-ui's lawyer on the 3rd that he was forced to harass by the director of tvN's entertainment program 'SIX SENSOR: City Tour 2', which recently aired. According to lawyer Lee, A suffered forced harassment in the process of moving to a location and returning home immediately after the second round of company dinner held near the office building in August. Five days after the incident, A, who was the production team of the program, was suddenly notified of the program's departure by the PD.
Lawyer Eun-Eun Lee said, `The victim urges the perpetrator to admit his wrongdoing even now and no longer produce secondary damage to the victim, and to show efforts to stop the secondary damage that continues to take place both inside and outside the company.'
A filed a petition with the Mapo Police Station in Seoul in August, and the police are investigating the case. CJ ENM acknowledged some of the sexual harassments of director B, who was identified as the perpetrator through an internal investigation, but decided that there was no charge for unilateral departure and workplace harassment. Both sides have filed objections to this.
On the same day, Cheongchul Lee Kyung-joon, a lawyer at the law firm who is the legal representative of the director B, also said that "the person who unilaterally claims the damage (hereinafter referred to as the 'true person') is the person whose transfer from the existing team was decided on August 20 due to the situation in which juniors, colleagues, seniors, and outside cooperative personnel complained about the grievances caused by the truer." "There was originally a judgment that this background should not be disclosed for the honor and reputation of the truer, but I would like to apologize and express my understanding as an agent for the fact that such unjust suspicions were raised.
In addition, lawyer Lee added, "The words and actions of the petitioner during the program production process led to continuous and repetitive conflicts between the petitioner and the members of the program team, and in the end, communication with each other was cut off to the extent that the core personnel essential to the work could not even make eye contact with the petitioner.'" Mr. A desperately tried to seal this situation and push the project forward normally, but even the conversations he had in that part resulted in a dispute with the petitioner.", he explained.
In addition, regarding Mr. A's decision to release, he decided that it was inevitable to change the team structure for the smooth production of the program after a long thought, and reported the conflict between the petitioner and the team members that he had tried to resolve on his own. The petitioner, who seemed to accept this, later expressed fierce opposition to Mr. B's superiors, and after the allegations were not accepted, he is attacking Mr. A with petitions dotted with false facts" he said.
In addition, the director B also denied A's allegations of forced harassment, saying, `All there was was contact at the level of tapping each other's shoulders or arming each other on the street where many passers-by and many colleagues were together at the break of the company dinner.' In addition, videos of the authenticator touching B's shoulder sitting still or approaching B from behind, trying to wrap his arm around B's shoulder were obtained. B and the law firm will faithfully investigate the investigation agency and prove their innocence clearly revealed in specific facts.
lunamoon@sportschosun.com
